S. D. V. Stephens

notes / Studies in Algebra and Group Theory / chapter 9: Inner Product Spaces

9.3 The Adjoint

9.3.1 Definition and Existence

Given a linear operator on an inner product space, we can define its “adjoint” by transposing the role of the two arguments in the inner product.

Definition 9.3.1 (Adjoint operator). Let be a finite-dimensional inner product space and a linear operator. The adjoint of is the unique linear operator satisfying for all .

Theorem 9.3.1 (Existence and uniqueness of the adjoint). For any linear operator on a finite-dimensional inner product space, the adjoint exists and is unique.

Proof (Existence). Fix . The map is a linear functional on .

Since the inner product is nondegenerate, the map defined by is an isomorphism. Thus there exists a unique with for all . Define .

We must check is linear. For and : Since this holds for all , we get .

Uniqueness: If also satisfies , then for all , so by nondegeneracy. ∎

Note. Alternatively, the adjoint can be described as follows. The inner product gives an isomorphism , . The transpose is defined by . Then This shows the adjoint is the “conjugate” of the transpose by the inner-product isomorphism.

9.3.2 Properties of the Adjoint

Proposition 9.3.1 (Algebraic properties of the adjoint). Let be linear operators on an inner product space, and . Then:

  1. .
  2. .
  3. .
  4. .
  5. .

Proof. Each follows from manipulating the defining equation .

(i) . So .

(iv) . ∎

Note. Property (iv) shows that taking adjoints reverses order, just like taking transposes or inverses. The map is a conjugate-linear anti-automorphism of .

Matrix of the Adjoint

Theorem 9.3.2 (Matrix of the adjoint). Let be an orthonormal basis of , and let be the matrix of in this basis. Then the matrix of is: where denotes the conjugate transpose.

Proof. The -entry of is the coefficient of in , which equals .

The -entry of is .

Using the defining property: The -entry of is , so ∎

Note. In an orthonormal basis, self-adjoint operators () correspond to symmetric matrices (real case) or Hermitian matrices (complex case, ).

Proposition 9.3.2 (Kernel and image of the adjoint). For :

  1. .
  2. .

Proof. (i) .

(ii) Apply (i) to : , i.e., . Taking orthogonal complements: (using in finite dimensions). ∎

Corollary 9.3.1 (Rank equality). .

Proof. . ∎