S. D. V. Stephens

notes / Studies in Algebra and Group Theory / chapter 6: Modules and Group Actions / From my notebooks

N29 Finitely generated abelian groups: presentations and primitive elements

In progress: these notes stop partway.

Theorem N29.1. Any finitely generated abelian group is isomorphic to a product of cyclic groups: (Since (i.e., coprime), we can factor further, e.g., to arrange that all the are powers of primes.)

Remark (Recall). is a -module, via .

If is finitely generated by , we get a surjection , and

Proposition N29.2 (Prop 1). If is a finitely generated module (over ), then there exist and such that . Equivalently, there is an exact sequence

The proof rests on the following.

Lemma N29.3. Any submodule (subgroup) of is finitely generated (and free of rank , too).

Proof. By induction on .

  • : the subgroups of are and , .
  • Assume the lemma is true for , and consider a submodule .
  • Consider the homomorphism i.e., .

So is a submodule, hence finitely generated (free) by induction. And is a subgroup of , hence free of rank 0 or 1. So and are finitely generated (free), which gives that is free (finitely generated). The proof goes like the one for the rank theorem.

Let be generators (a basis) of , and let be generators (a basis) of . We claim that generate (are a basis of) .

For all we have , so there are such that so there are such that , i.e., ∎

Proof of Prop 1. If is finitely generated, with generators , then is surjective, and is a subgroup/submodule of , so it is finitely generated by the lemma. So (go over this) for some , which gives the exact sequence So, given , we get . ∎

Divisibility

Divisibility of elements of , in a free module (over ).

Definition N29.4. The divisibility of , , is the largest such that there is with ; concretely, . We say is primitive if its divisibility is .

Lemma N29.5. An element of a free finitely generated module () can be part of a basis if and only if it is primitive.

Proof. An element of a basis must be primitive: with would contradict linear independence.

Conversely, let be a primitive element, written in a basis . Since , WLOG we can assume and i.e., is minimal among the nonzero coefficients.

Guys, we’re changing basis now!! ∎

Proposition N29.6 (Prop 2). For every there exists a basis …